Protección de la propiedad intelectual y su influencia en países en vía de desarrollo
Protección de la propiedad intelectual y su influencia en países en vía de desarrollo
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##
PDF
FLIP
HTML
Al enviar los artículos para su publicación, el (los) autores aceptan que para su publicación transferirán los derechos de autor a la Universidad Surcolombiana, para su difusión en versión impresa o electrónica.
Se entiende que las opiniones y valoraciones expresadas por los autores en los artículos son de
responsabilidad exclusiva de ellos y no comprometen la opinión y política científica de la Vicerrectoría de Investigación y Proyección Social de la Universidad Surcolombiana.
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##
El fortalecimiento de los esquemas de protección de la propiedad intelectual a nivel global es una tendencia que se reafirma con el Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Right – TRIPS establecido en 1994 en el marco de las acciones de la Organización Mundial de Comercio. Desde entonces, la discusión sobre el impacto de este mecanismo en los países en vía de desarrollo está abierta. Este artículo recoge argumentos en pro y contra del beneficio de este acuerdo y en complemento expone planteamientos que intentan una aplicación equilibrada del TRIPS que atienda tanto los intereses de países desarrollados como países en vía de desarrollo, siendo la principal conclusión la consolidación de esquemas flexibles en función de las condiciones específicas de países y de sectores.
Descargas
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##
Aghion, P., Howitt, P. A model of growth through creative destruction. Econométrica 60(1992):323-351.
Banco Mundial. Intellectual property: balancing incentives with competitive access. In: Global Economic Prospects. World Bank, Washington, DC, 2001:129-150.
Bhat M.G., Trade-related intellectual property rights to biological resources: Socioeconomic implications for developing countries. Ecological Economics 19(1996): 205-217.
Branstetter L. Fisman, Raymond, Foley, C. Fritz, Saggi, Kamal, Intellectual property rights, imitation and foreign direct investment: Theory and Evidence. NBER Working Paper, 13033. 2007.
Byström, M., Einarsson, P., Nycander, G. Fair and Equitable: Sharing the Benefits from Use of Genetic Resources and Tradi- tional Knowledge. Swedish Scientific Council on Biological Diversity, 1999.
Chakravarthi, R. IPRs, Genes, and Life-patenting, South - North Development Monitor, SUNS, http://www.biotech-info.net/ IPRs genes.html. 1999.
Chen Y., Puttitanun T. Intellectual property rights and innovation in developing countries. Journal of Development Economics, 78(2005):474-493.
David, P.A. A Tragedy of the Public Knowledge ‘Commons’?: Global Science, Intellectual Property and the Digital Technology Boomerang. Electronic Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, OIPRC, Oxford, 2000.
David, P.A. The evolution of intellectual property institutions. Paper prepared for presentation at the meetings of the International Economic Association in Moscow, August 24-28, 1992.
Dinopoulos E., Segerstrom P. Intellectual property rights, multinational firms and economic growth. Journal of Development Economics 92(2010): 13-27.
Dunning J. H., Narula R.Multinationals and industrial competitiveness: A new agenda. Northampton, 2004.
Forero C. The impact of stronger intellectual property rights on science and technology in developing countries. Research Policy 35(2006):808-824.
Furukawa Y. The protection of intellectual property rights and endogenous growth: Is stronger always better?. Journal of Economic Dynamics & Control 31(2007):3644-3670.
Ghauri P. N., Buckley P.J. Globalization, multinational enterprises and world poverty. S. Jain & S. Vachani Eds, Globalization and world poverty, (2006):215-227.
Granstrand O. Innovation and intellectual property rights. The Oxford Handbook of Innovation. Chapter 10. Oxford: University Press. (2004):266-290.
Hurlbut, D. Fixing the Biodiversity Convention: Toward a Special Protocol for Related Intellectual Property. Natural Resources Journal, 34 (Spring)(1994):379-409.
Ivus O. Do stronger patent rights raise high-tech exports to the developing world?. Journal of International Economics 81(2010):38-47.
Kima Y. K., Leeb K., Parkc W. G., Choo K. Appropriate intellectual property protection and economic growth in countries at different levels of development. Research Policy 41(2012):358-375.
Kingston, W. Innovation needs patents reform. Research Policy 30(2001):403-423.
Khalil, M.H., Reid, W.V. and Juma, C. Property Rights, Biotechnology and Genetic Resources. Biopolicy Interna- tional, African Center for Technology Studies, Nairobi, 1992.
Khoury T.A., Peng M.W. Does institutional reform of intellectual property rights lead to more inbound FDI? Evidence from Latin America and the Caribbean. Journal of World Business 46(2011):337-345.
Lai E.L.C., Qiu L.D. The North’s intellectual property rights standard for the South? Journal of International Economics 59(2003):183-209.
Lalitha N. Diffusion of agricultural biotechnology and intellectual property rights: emerging issues in India. Ecological Economics 49(2004):187-198.
Lall S. Indicators of the relative importance of IPRs in developing countries. Research Policy 32(2003):1657-1680.
Léger A. Intellectual Property Rights in Mexico: Do They Play a Role? World Development 33(11)(2005):1865-1879.
Markusen J. Contracts, intellectual property rights, and multinational investment in developing countries. Journal of International Economics 53(2001):189-204.
Penrose, E. The Economics of the International Patent System. Policies Relating to Technology of the Countries of the Andean Pact: Their Foundations. UNCTAD, Johns Hopkins Press, 1951.
Romer, P.M. Endogenous technological change. Journal of Political Economy 98, 1990.
Sarkissian A. Intellectual property rights for developing countries: Lessons from Iran. Technovation 28(2008):786-798.
Schneider P.H. International trade, economic growth and intellectual prop:erty rights: A panel data study of developed and developing countries. Journal of Development Economics 78(2005):529-547.
Schumpeter, J.A. The Theory of Economic Development. London: Transaction Publishers,1934.
Srinivasan C.S. Concentration in ownershipof plant variety rights: some implications for developing countries. Food Policy 28(2003):519-546.
Suthersanen, U. Utility models and innovation in developing countries. The International Centre for Trade and Sustainable Development Issue Paper 13, UNCTAD, 2006.
Verspagen B. Innovation and Economic Growth. The Oxford Handbook of Innovation. Chapter 18. Oxford University Press. (2004):487-513.
World Trade Organization. 1994. Agreement on traderelated aspects of intellectual property rights. http://www.wto.org/english/docs_e/legal_e/27-trips_01_e.htm.
World Trade Organization. 1994. Agreement on trade related aspects of intellectual property rights. http://www.wto.org/english/docs_e/legal_e/27-trips_01_e.htm.
Yang D. The development of intellectual property in China. World Patent Information 25(2011):131-142.
