Constitutional judge and interpretation of rules in Japan
El juez constitucional e interpretación de normas en Japón
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##
PDF (Español (España))
FLIP
HTML (Español (España))
The author (or authors) of the article titled: ________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________, which is submitted to the editorial process, certifies and authorizes the following considerations:
- I certify that I am a primary author of the article presented for possible publication. I guarantee that the entire content is a product of my intellectual contribution. All information and references to any material already published are correctly attributed and included in the references and citations. In cases when it is required, I have obtained the necessary permissions from those who possess the property rights.
- The article has not been published nor submitted simultaneously to any other serial publication for editorial consideration.
- I certify that all the references and cites in the article are cited according to the journal’s guidelines.
- I authorize the journal to evaluate and ask for external evaluation (peer reviewers).
- I guarantee that all the materials presented are entirely free of copyright. I am responsible for any lawsuit or any complaint related to intellectual property rights. I release Surcolombiana University of any charge.
- I authorize the journal to send emails to solve any situation presented during the editorial process.
- In the case that the article is approved for publication, as author and owner of the copyright, I transfer the rights to the journal unlimited time to include the manuscript in the Piélagus Journal. The text can be reproduced, edited, exhibited, and circulated in the country and abroad. That process can be through print, electronic publication, CD ROM, internet, full text or any other means known or to be known.
By completing the following, I confirm the previous to be true and agree to the aforementioned terms on __________ (month) the ____ (day), 20__ in ___city____, (____Country__).
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##
This article develops, in an expository and analytical way, the composition of the Japanese judicial system from the analysis of the Political Constitution of 1946. Moreover, it focuses on the powers granted by the Political Charter to judges in Japan, as well as on the interpretation of the rule and the very conservative and “oppositional” role of the Supreme Court of Justice as the high court charged with decreeing the constitutionality or unconstitutionality of any law, decree, regulation or official act. The repeated tendency has been to “dodge” the issue of constitutionality and to enforce the legislator’s discretion.
Downloads
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##
I. Japón. Corte Suprema de Justicia. Sentencia del 13 de marzo de 1957.
II. Japón. Corte Suprema de Justicia. Sentencia del 14 de abril de 1976.
III. Japón. Corte Suprema de Justicia. Sentencia del 7 de julio de 1982.
IV. Japón. Sentencia de la Corte de Apelación de Osaka. 10 de noviembre de 1975.
V. Japón. Sentencia del Tribunal de Kobé. 20 de septiembre de 1975.
VI. Junichi, A. (2007). Rasseru (en japonés). Japón, Tokio.
VII. Sonobe, I. (2001). 10 ans de la Cour suprême (Saikou-saibannsyo 10nenn). Japón, Tokio: Yuhikaku.
VIII. Takii, Shigeo. (2010). La Cour suprême a changé ? (Saikou-saibannsyo ha kawattaka ?). Japón, Tokio: Iwanami-shoten.
IX. Ueno, M. (2010). Justice, Constitution et droits fondamentaux au Japon. Francia, París: LGDJ.
X. US Supreme Court (1936). Ashwander v. Tennessee Valley Authority. 297 U.S. 288. Recuperado de: https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/297/288/
