The control of constitutionality in Colombia: announced failure of the French theory of the models of constitutional justice
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##
PDF (Español (España))
FLIP
The author (or authors) of the article titled: ________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________, which is submitted to the editorial process, certifies and authorizes the following considerations:
- I certify that I am a primary author of the article presented for possible publication. I guarantee that the entire content is a product of my intellectual contribution. All information and references to any material already published are correctly attributed and included in the references and citations. In cases when it is required, I have obtained the necessary permissions from those who possess the property rights.
- The article has not been published nor submitted simultaneously to any other serial publication for editorial consideration.
- I certify that all the references and cites in the article are cited according to the journal’s guidelines.
- I authorize the journal to evaluate and ask for external evaluation (peer reviewers).
- I guarantee that all the materials presented are entirely free of copyright. I am responsible for any lawsuit or any complaint related to intellectual property rights. I release Surcolombiana University of any charge.
- I authorize the journal to send emails to solve any situation presented during the editorial process.
- In the case that the article is approved for publication, as author and owner of the copyright, I transfer the rights to the journal unlimited time to include the manuscript in the Piélagus Journal. The text can be reproduced, edited, exhibited, and circulated in the country and abroad. That process can be through print, electronic publication, CD ROM, internet, full text or any other means known or to be known.
By completing the following, I confirm the previous to be true and agree to the aforementioned terms on __________ (month) the ____ (day), 20__ in ___city____, (____Country__).
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##
This article exposes the classic criteria of distinction between the American and European models of constitutional justice. In light of the Colombian case, the author shows the theoretical and practical limits of the binary presentation of models of constitutional justice and the need to overcome such models from an open view of comparative constitutional law. Indeed, there are mixed or hybrid models, beyond the limits of the West, which should be considered under the logic of equal dignity of all positive rights.
Downloads
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##
I. Tusseau, G. (2009a). Contre les « modèles » de justice constitutionnelle. Essai de critique méthodologique / Modelli di giustizia costituzionale. Saggio di critica metodologica, pref. Pegoraro, L., éd. bilingue, trad. it. Morandini, A. Bolonia: Bononia University Press, coll. « Ricerche di diritto comparato », 87+106.
II. Tusseau, G. (2009b). Regard critique sur les outils méthodologiques du comparatisme. L’exemple des modèles de justice constitutionnelle. Revista general de Derecho público comparado, n° 4.
III. Tusseau, G. (2011). Para acabar con los «modelos» de jurisdicción constitucional: Un ensayo de crítica, 2a ed., revisada y aumentada, trad. esp. en colaboración con García Berrio Hernández, T., pres. Ferrer Mac-Gregor, E. México: Porrúa, col. «Biblioteca de Derecho Procesal Constitucional», Vol. 50, 2011, xix+171.
IV. Tusseau, G. (2013a). Oltre i ‘modelli’ di giustizia costituzionale, verso una comparazione pragmatista, trad. it. Bagni, S.. En Bagni, S. (a cura di), Giustizia costituzionale comparata. Proposte classificatorie a confronto. Bolonia: Bononia University Press, coll. « Ricerche di diritto pubblico comparato », 2013, 245 p., pp. 23-46;
V. Tusseau, G. (2013b). Au-delà des ‘modèles’ de justice constitutionnelle, pour un comparatisme pragmatiste. Revista general de Derecho público comparado, n° 12.
VI. Tusseau, G. (2014). Más allá de los ‘modelos’ de justicia constitucional, hacia una comparación pragmatista, trad. cast. López Ulla, J.M. En Bagni, S. (coord.), Justicia constitucional comparada. México: Porrúa, col. « Biblioteca de Derecho Procesal Constitucional », Vol. 106, 2014, xvi+408 (21-60);
VII. Tusseau, G. (2014). Au-delà des ‘modèles’ de justice constitutionnelle, pour un comparatisme pragmatiste. En Pegoraro, L., Bagni, S. y Pavani, G. (a cura di), Metodologia della comparazione. Lo studio dei sistemi giudiziari nel contesto euro-americano. Bolonia: Filodiritto editore, 192, (160-175)
VIII. Tusseau, G. (2015). Les causes du choix d’un modèle de contrôle de constitutionnalité. Observations critiques sur un dogme explicatif de l’étude du contentieux constitutionnel. Jus politicum. Revue de droit politique, Vol. VII, 217-244.
IX. Tusseau, G. (2016). La elección de un modelo de control de constitucionalidad: entre explicación y dogma. Parlamento y constitución. Anuario. Año 2015, n° 17, 9-36.
X. Tusseau, G. (2020). Assouplir la construction des modèles de justice constitutionnelle à la lumière de la Question prioritaire de constitutionnalité. En Vidal-Naquet, A., Magnon, X. (dir.). La QPC, vers une reconfiguration de l’architecture juridictionnelle ?. Aix-en-Provence: Presses universitaires d’Aix-Marseille, 200 (153-162).
XI. Tusseau, G. (2021a). Contentieux constitutionnel comparé. Une introduction critique au droit processuel constitutionnel. Paris La Défense: Lextenso, 1452.
XII. Tusseau, G. (2021b). Droit comparé et théorie générale du droit. Notes sur quelques allers-retours aporétiques. Sainte-Foy: Les Presses de l’Université Laval, coll. « Dikè », xi+93, réédition Paris: Hermann, coll. « Dikè », xi+93.
