The right to due process in the sanctions imposed by the state in land transport
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##
PDF (Español (España))
FLIP
HTML (Español (España))
The author (or authors) of the article titled: ________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________, which is submitted to the editorial process, certifies and authorizes the following considerations:
- I certify that I am a primary author of the article presented for possible publication. I guarantee that the entire content is a product of my intellectual contribution. All information and references to any material already published are correctly attributed and included in the references and citations. In cases when it is required, I have obtained the necessary permissions from those who possess the property rights.
- The article has not been published nor submitted simultaneously to any other serial publication for editorial consideration.
- I certify that all the references and cites in the article are cited according to the journal’s guidelines.
- I authorize the journal to evaluate and ask for external evaluation (peer reviewers).
- I guarantee that all the materials presented are entirely free of copyright. I am responsible for any lawsuit or any complaint related to intellectual property rights. I release Surcolombiana University of any charge.
- I authorize the journal to send emails to solve any situation presented during the editorial process.
- In the case that the article is approved for publication, as author and owner of the copyright, I transfer the rights to the journal unlimited time to include the manuscript in the Piélagus Journal. The text can be reproduced, edited, exhibited, and circulated in the country and abroad. That process can be through print, electronic publication, CD ROM, internet, full text or any other means known or to be known.
By completing the following, I confirm the previous to be true and agree to the aforementioned terms on __________ (month) the ____ (day), 20__ in ___city____, (____Country__).
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##
In Colombia, the land transport sector has grown exponentially, to extent that both the structure, activity and the profits had to be studied and regulated by the State, in order to balance public and private interests at stake.
The factual situation outlined in the previous paragraph has allowed the state to vigorously strengthen its intervention through the punitive power of the administration, which is nothing more than an instrument through which the state punishes behaviors that violate the committed state advocated by the 1991 Constitution and the laws that develop and regulate the public land transport service. However, the practice of this power to punish is to counterbalance respect for due process of the investigated and punished, which obliges the state to respect procedures and principles for its decisions in accordance with law.
Despite, the apparent conceptual clarity outlined, there is a gap unified doctrinal development on the subject, which has led to their unification and development through to case law by the Constitutional Court, in the Court below, and the Colombian State Council, in forward the Council, who through their criteria have been deserving characterization and development by outlining the doctrine and legal scholars, especially the concepts embodied in the judgments uttered during the last 15 years.
Downloads
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##
Atehortúa, C. 2006. Servicios públicos domiciliarios, proveedores y régimen de controles. Bogotá D.C. Universidad Externado de Colombia.
Benlloch, G. 1998. El Principio de non bis in idem en las relaciones entre el Derecho penal y el Derecho disciplinario. Revista del Poder Judicial (51) págs. 322 – 324.
De la Rosa Cortina, J. 2003. Relaciones entre derecho penal y derecho administrativo sancionador. En especial, el principio Non Bis In Idem, Revista del Ministerio Fiscal (11), Ministerio de Justicia, Madrid.
Nieto, A. 2005. Derecho administrativo sancionador, 4 edición. Madrid. Editorial Tecnos.
Ossa, J. 2000. Derecho administrativo sancionador, Una aproximación dogmática, 2 edición. Bogotá. editorial Legis.
Parada, J. 1972. El poder sancionador de la administración y la crisis del sistema judicial penal. Revista de administración pública (67).
Santofimio, J. 2003. Tratado de derecho administrativo, acto administrativo: procedimiento, eficacia y validez, 4 edición. Bogotá, D.C. Universidad Externado de Colombia.
Referencias Normativas
C.N
• L 105/1993.
• L 336/1996.
• L 769/2002.
• L 1383/2010.
Referencias Jurisprudenciales
Consejo de Estado
• CE1, 14 May. 1998, r2126, L. Rodríguez.
• CE1, 3 Jun. 1999, r5200, E. Ariza.
• CE1, 19 Oct. 2000, r5964, G. Mendoza.
• CE1, 21 Sept. 2001, r6792, M. Urueta.
• CE1, 7 Mar.2002, r7293, M. Urueta.
• CE1, 6 Sept. 2002, r6982, M. Urueta.
• CE1, 24 Jul. 2003, r8365, M. Urueta.
• CE4, 25 Ago. 2005, M. Ortiz.
• CE1, 20 Oct. 2005, r7826, R. Ostau de Lafont Pianeta.
• CE4, 10 May. 2007, M. Ortiz.
• CE1, 3 Jul. 2008, r209-01, R. Ostau de Lafont Pianeta
• CE3, 2 Abr. 2009, M. Velilla.
• CE4, 28 May. 2009, M. Sanz.
• CE4, 24 Sept. 2009, M. Sanz.
• CE1, 12 Nov. 2009, R. Ostau de Lafont Pianeta.
• CE1, 26 Nov.2009, M. Rojas
• CE3, 4 Feb. 2010, M. Velilla
• CE1, 6 May. 2010. R. Ostau de Lafont Pianeta.
• CE1, 10 Jun. 2010, M. Rojas.
• CE1, 7 Oct. 2010, M. García.
• CE1, 29 Nov. 2010, R. Ostau De Lafont Pianeta
• CE1, 18 Agosto 2011, R. Ostau De Lafont Pianeta
Corte Constitucional
• CConst, T-976/1999, F. Morón.
• CConst, T-786 /2000, Barrera, A.
• CConst, T-214 /2006, Monroy, M.
• CConst, T-199 /2006, Gaviria, C.
• CConst, C-980 /2010, Mendoza, G.
• CConst, C-089 /2011, Vargas, L.
