Transfer, medical, in fairness, procedural expenses, according to the judgments of the Inter-American Court of human rights.
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##
The article examines an issue of utmost importance and relevance, on reparations and indemnities as are the expenses mentioned in the resolutions issued by the Inter-American Court, which aims to redress the economic and material damage suffered by the victim and / or their relatives for government actions.
Thus, Article allow you to understand what you mean each of these expenses, the Inter-American Court of Human Rights authorized and directed to the inter-American system of human rights protection; such as the cost of equity; doctors; required; Reasonable Movement, Extrajudicial and prudent estimate, among others.
Downloads
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##
Sentencias de la Corte Interamericana de Derechos Humanos
Caso Blake Vs. Guatemala, sentencia del 22 de enero de 1999.
Caso Caballero Delgado y Santana, Reparaciones, Sentencia 29 de enero de 1997.
Caso Castillo Páez Vs. Perú, Sentencia de 27 de noviembre de 1998.
Caso El Amparo, Reparaciones, Sentencia de 14 de septiembre de 1996.
Caso Garrido y Baigorria Vs. Argentina, sentencia del 27 de agosto de 1998.
Caso Godínez Cruz, Indemnización Compensatoria, Sentencia de 21 de julio de 1989.
Caso Loayza Tamayo Vs. Perú, sentencia 17 de septiembre de 1997.
Caso Neira Alegría y otros, Reparaciones, Sentencia de 19 de septiembre de 1996.
Caso Paniagua Morales y otros Vs. Guatemala, sentencia del 25 de mayo de 2001.
Caso Suárez Rosero Vs. Ecuador.
Caso Velásquez Rodríguez, Indemnización Compensatoria, Sentencia de 21 de julio de 1989