Predicaments of e-democracy in Serbia
Predicamentos de la democracia en Serbia
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##
PDF (Español (España))
FLIP
HTML (Español (España))
The author (or authors) of the article titled: ________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________, which is submitted to the editorial process, certifies and authorizes the following considerations:
- I certify that I am a primary author of the article presented for possible publication. I guarantee that the entire content is a product of my intellectual contribution. All information and references to any material already published are correctly attributed and included in the references and citations. In cases when it is required, I have obtained the necessary permissions from those who possess the property rights.
- The article has not been published nor submitted simultaneously to any other serial publication for editorial consideration.
- I certify that all the references and cites in the article are cited according to the journal’s guidelines.
- I authorize the journal to evaluate and ask for external evaluation (peer reviewers).
- I guarantee that all the materials presented are entirely free of copyright. I am responsible for any lawsuit or any complaint related to intellectual property rights. I release Surcolombiana University of any charge.
- I authorize the journal to send emails to solve any situation presented during the editorial process.
- In the case that the article is approved for publication, as author and owner of the copyright, I transfer the rights to the journal unlimited time to include the manuscript in the Piélagus Journal. The text can be reproduced, edited, exhibited, and circulated in the country and abroad. That process can be through print, electronic publication, CD ROM, internet, full text or any other means known or to be known.
By completing the following, I confirm the previous to be true and agree to the aforementioned terms on __________ (month) the ____ (day), 20__ in ___city____, (____Country__).
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##
The statistics of 2013 in Serbia show that almost 60% of the total population are computer owners, which is 5% more than in 2012. In addition, about 56% have Internet access, which increased by 8 % over last year. This makes it fast, continued strong for the use of information technology and communications (ICT) in the management of the different functions of the state development. The first step was done in the exploitation of various forms of administration, which is mainly limited to electronic services, improving the previous bureaucratic tradition, the communication between citizens and the state administration. In addition, the administration included the first attempts of the participation process by enabling citizens to express their opinion through public discussion in the process of drafting the law, as well as various forms of debate held in the web portal specialized government.
Given the increasing spread of literacy and Internet access to hardware, the authors state that participation does not yet provide an adequate or substantial impact of citizens in the political process. In order to reduce a gap between citizens and the state authorities in decision-making procedures, the most comprehensive statement of the institutions of direct democracy is now possible and necessary, but some obstacles in the way. For starters, you can score the introduction of participation through referendum, at least partly, locally, particularly in technologically developed regions, with an important educational function. It could stimulate interest in political participation in general, logistics preparation for other forms of further development of democracy. However, the problem in Serbia is not primarily connected to the difficulties or technological barriers, but to the will of the political elite to accept the transfer of real sovereignty of the people as its owner.
Downloads
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##
Altman. D. (2011). La Democracia Directa en el mundo. Nueva York, Cambridge University Press.
Ransière. J. (2009). Odio a la democracia. Londres,Verso.
Walzer. M. (2006) Política y Pasión - Hacia un liberalismo más igualitario. New Haven y Londres, Yale University Press.
Rousseau. J. (1992). El contrato social. Paris, Flammarion.
M. (2003). Fundamentos de la Teoría del Estado y Derecho, Belgrado, Academia de Policía.
Catt, H. (1999). Democracia en la práctica, Londres-Nueva York. Routledge.
Bobbio. N. (1987). El futuro de la democracia - En defensa de las Reglas de Juego. Roger Griffin (trad.), Minneapolis, University of Minnesota Press.
Kersting, N. Leenes, R. & Svensson, J. (2004). El voto electrónico y la Democracia - Un Análisis Comparativo (eds. N. Kersting, H. Baldersheim), Nueva York, Palgrave Macmillan.
Wilhelm. A. (2000). La democracia en la era digital, los desafíos a la vida política en el espacio cibernético, Nueva York-Londres, Routledge.
Buchstein. H. (2004). La democracia en línea, ¿Es viable? ¿Es deseable? Internet Votación y Teoría Democrática Normativa «, voto electrónico y la Democracia - Un Análisis Comparativo (ed. N. Kersting, H. Baldersheim), Nueva York, Palgrave Macmillan.
Butler, D. & Ranney, A. (1980). Referendo - Un estudio comparativo de la práctica y la teoría, Empresa Americana Enterprise Institute de Washington, Investigación de Políticas Públicas.
Beetham. D. (2005). Democracia, Oxford, Oneworld,
Held, D. (2006). Modelos de Democracia, Barcelona, Paidós.
Pratchett, L; Routledge, N; Kersting, R; Leenes, J. Svensson. (2005). Equilibrio entre seguridad y simplicidad en el voto electrónico: hacia un compromiso efectivo. La Unión Europea y el voto electrónico. eds A. Trechsel, F. Méndez, Londres-Nueva York, pp. 282-284.
Álvarez, M. & Hall, T. (2008). Elecciones electrónicas - Los peligros y promesas de Democracia Digital, Princeton y Oxford, Princeton University Press.
Drechsler, W. & Madise, Ü. (2004). El Voto Electrónico en Estonia», voto electrónico y la Democracia - Un Análisis Comparativo (eds N. Kersting, H. Baldersheim). Nueva York, Palgrave Macmillan.
Gibson (2005). Voto por Internet y las elecciones al Parlamento Europeo», La Unión Europea y el voto electrónico (eds. A. Trechsel, F. Méndez), Londres-Nueva York, Routledge. Klaèar. B. (2011). El alcance y la intensidad de la participación directa de los ciudadanos a
través de referendos investigación, «las iniciativas y las asambleas de los ciudadanos, la participación directa de los ciudadanos en la comunidad local». Problemas, retos y recomendaciones para la mejora de procesos, Belgrado, OSCE.
PÁGINAS WEB
Clift, S. La Democracia, y el gobierno público», disponible en http://www.publicus.net/articles/edempublicnetwork.html.(Consultado, diciembre de 2013).
