Time and process in the digital age

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##


Ver / Descargar
PDF (Español (España)) FLIP HTML (Español (España))

How to Cite
Cabral Coutinho, C. M., & de Magalhães Barros, F. (2015). Time and process in the digital age. Revista Jurídica Piélagus, 14(1), 131–144. https://doi.org/10.25054/16576799.679
More Citation Formats
Published: Dec 7, 2015
Doi
https://doi.org/10.25054/16576799.679
Dimensions
PlumX
Issue
Vol. 14 (2015)
Section
Articles
License terms / See

The author (or authors) of the article titled: ________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________, which is submitted to the editorial process, certifies and authorizes the following considerations:

 

  • I certify that I am a primary author of the article presented for possible publication. I guarantee that the entire content is a product of my intellectual contribution. All information and references to any material already published are correctly attributed and included in the references and citations. In cases when it is required, I have obtained the necessary permissions from those who possess the property rights.
  • The article has not been published nor submitted simultaneously to any other serial publication for editorial consideration.
  • I certify that all the references and cites in the article are cited according to the journal’s guidelines.
  • I authorize the journal to evaluate and ask for external evaluation (peer reviewers).
  • I guarantee that all the materials presented are entirely free of copyright. I am responsible for any lawsuit or any complaint related to intellectual property rights. I release Surcolombiana University of any charge.
  • I authorize the journal to send emails to solve any situation presented during the editorial process.
  • In the case that the article is approved for publication, as author and owner of the copyright, I transfer the rights to the journal unlimited time to include the manuscript in the Piélagus Journal. The text can be reproduced, edited, exhibited, and circulated in the country and abroad. That process can be through print, electronic publication, CD ROM, internet, full text or any other means known or to be known.

 

By completing the following, I confirm the previous to be true and agree to the aforementioned terms on __________ (month) the ____ (day), 20__ in ___city____, (____Country__).

Statement of originality

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

Carlos Marden Cabral Coutinho Universidad Católica de Minas Gerais
Flaviane de Magalhães Barros Pontificia Universidad Católica de Minas Gerais PUC Minas
Abstract
The article that’s proposed intends to analyze the relationship between time and process in the Digital Age, specifically from the perspective of constitutional democracy. The question of the duration was always central in discussions about process, and the current topic usually is how to operationalize judgments faster. In the Digital Age, with the possibility of recourse to virtual process (which already happens in many countries, such as Brazil, Italy and Portugal), has rised a new field of possibilities in which the bureaucracy was overcome by judicial facilities inherent digital world. Faced with such a novelty, there are many devices used to cause an increasing number of cases to be tried in less time. It turns out that the time of the process cannot be deleted freely, because time is directly involved in the exercise of guarantees as contradictory and full defense (duel process of law); so, as much as the technology allows them to judge in a scheme of assembly lines, it must preserve a minimum time that makes possible to the party exercise the rights that are constitutionally guaranteed. Faced with this question, the work that is proposed is to examine whether there are limits to the temporal acceleration that can be promoted by digital media. The goal is to demonstrate that, even with the digital resources available, not every device acceleration must be admitted, because some of them may represent a commitment on the part of the full action in court.
Keywords

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##

Author Biographies / See

Carlos Marden Cabral Coutinho, Universidad Católica de Minas Gerais

Doctor en Derecho Procesal Pontificia Universidad Católica de Minas Gerais (Brasil) Procurador Federal

Flaviane de Magalhães Barros, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Minas Gerais PUC Minas

Doctor en Derecho Procesal Pontificia Universidad Católica de Minas Gerais (Brasil) Profesor, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Minas Gerais PUC Minas
References

Abrão, C. (2009). Proceso electrónico: Ley N° 11.419, de 19 de diciembre de 2006. São Paulo: Editora Revista dos Tribunales.

Alvim, J. & Cabral, J. (2008). Proceso judicial electrónico. Curitiba: Juruá.

Andolina, I; Vignera, G. (1997). Los fundamentos constitucionales de la justicia civil: el modelo constitucional del proceso civil italiano. 2. ed. Torino: G. Editorial Giappichelli.

Ateniense, A. (2010). Comentarios sobre la Ley N°11.419/06 y las prácticas procesales por vía electrónica en los tribunales brasileños. Curitiba: Juruá.

Baracho, J. (2008). Derecho Procesal Constitucional:aspectos contemporáneos. Belo Horizonte: Forum.

Barros, F. (2008). Las razones de las decisiones de modelo constitucional del proceso. Revista del Instituto Hermenéutico Jurídico. v. 6. Porto Alegre, pp. 131, 148.

Breton, de Carvalho Dias Ronaldo. Proceso constitucional y el estado democrático. Belo Horizonte: Del Rey, 2010.

Calmon de Pasos, J. (2008). Consideraciones de un hombre de las cavernas en el proceso electrónico. En: JAYME, Fernando Gonzaga; FARIA, Juliana Cordero; y laura María Tierras (coordinadores). Proceso civil: nuevas tendencias. Belo Horizonte: Del Rey, pp. 95-99.

Dinamarco, C. (1998). La instrumentalidad del proceso. São Paulo: Malheiros.

Fazzalari, E. (1992). Instituciones de derecho procesal. Padova, CEDAM.

Goldschmidt, J. (1936). Teoría general del proceso. Barcelona: Editorial Labor.

Gomes, C. (2003). Tiempo de los tribunales: un estudio sobre la lentitud de la justicia. Coimbra: Coimbra Editora.

Goncalves, A. (1992). Técnica de procedimiento y de la teoría del caso. Río de Janeiro: Aide.

Greene, B. (2001). El elegante universo: supercuerdas, dimensiones ocultas y la búsqueda de la teoría final. São Paulo: Compañía de las Letras.

Habermas, J. (2003). Derecho y democracia: Entre facticidad y validez. Trad. Flávio Beno Siebeneicheler. Río de Janeiro: Tiempo de Brasil.

Hesse, K. (1991). Normativa de la Fuerza de la Constitución. Trad. Gilmar Ferreira Mendes. Porto Alegre: Sérgio Antônio Fabricación Editor.

Lipovetsky, G. (2004). Los tiempos hipermodernos. São Paulo: Editora Barbacolla.

Marramao, G. (2005). Apología del tiempo de débito. Roma: Editorial Laterza.

Marramao, G. (2008). La pasión del presente. Turín: Bollato Boringhiero.

Martins, C. (2010). El punto ciego de la derecha: las lecciones brasileñas. Río de Janeiro: Editora Lumen Juris.

Nunes,J. (2008). Proceso Constitucional Democrática. Curitiba: Juruá.

Prigogine, I. (2008). El nacimiento de tiempo. Lisboa: Ediciones 70.

Taruffo, M. (2001). Aspectos fundamentales del proceso del Civil, Derecho Civil y Derecho Común. Diario Facultad de Derecho de la UFPR, volumen 36, pp. 27-48.

OJS System - Metabiblioteca |