Impact of percutaneous tracheostomy implementation in the Adult-ICU at the University Hospital of Neiva
Impacto de la implementación de la traqueostomía percutánea en la UCI-A del Hospital Universitario de Neiva
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##
Objective: Open tracheostomy (OT) and percutaneous tracheostomy (PT) are frequent procedures in mechanically ventilated patients in Intensive Care Unit (ICU). Several publications have compared both techniques and their complications, especially in developed countries. This study aims to identify the characteristics of the OT and PT procedures, analyzing their complications in an ICU population of a university hospital in a developing country. Materials and Methods: in the adult ICU in Neiva University Hospital (NUH), 66 OT and 46 PT were performed in a 21-month and 6-month period, respectively. These two retrospective cohorts were analyzed, including demographic and causal factors, request reasons, accomplishment times. Early complications and mortality were also analyzed. Results: The incidence of PT was 12.5% compared with 9% of OT. Early tracheostomy (first 10 days of orotracheal intubation), was more frequent percutaneously (OT:70%, PT: 96%). Early complications were 2.9 times more common in OT patients compared with PT (p:0.00015). Bleeding was the main complication in both techniques, being 4.7 times greater in OT compared with PT (p: 0.0022). The infection rate of surgical site was 5.6 times greater in OT than in PT (p: 0.0009). There was no association between the coagulation times as a risk factor and postsurgical bleeding. Complications like false route and pneuromathorax were present only in the PT group and were immediately solved by the surgeon in charge of the case. There was no mortality related to the procedure in any case. Conclusions: during the analysis of OT and PT carried out in the Adult ICU of the NUH, complications like bleeding and infection at the operatory site were minimal in the PT group compared with OT. PT was carried out earlier and in less time compared with OT which implies improvement in the opportunity of its performance.
Downloads
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##
Silvester W., Goldsmith D., Uchino S. et al. Percutaneous versus surgical tracheotomy; a randomized controlled study with long–term follow-up. Critical Care Medicine 2006;34:2145-2152.
Gysin C., Dulguerov P., Goyot JP. et al. Percutaneous versus surgical tracheotomy. A double blind randomized trial. Annals of Surgery. 1999;2307:708-714
Ciaglia P., Firsching R., Syniec C. Elective percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy. A new simple bedside procedure: A preliminary report. Intensive Care Medicine. 1985;87:715-719
Ciaglia P., Graniero DG. Percutaneous diltatational tracheostomy. Results and longterm follow-up. Chest 1992;101:464-467.
Freeman BD., Buchman G. Tracheostomy in critically ill patients. A meta-analysis of prospective trials comparing percutaneous and surgical. Chest 2000;118:1412-1418
Freeman BD., Isabella K., Cobb JP. et al. A prospective, randomized study comparing percutaneous with surgical tracheostomy in critically ill patients. Critical Care Medicine 2001;29: 926-930.
Polderman KH., Spijkstra JJ., de Bree R. et al. Percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy in the ICU; Optimal organization, low complication rates and description of a new complications. Chest 2003;123:1595-1602.
Kost KM. Endoscopic percutaneous diltational tracheostomy a prospective evaluation of 500 consecutive cases. Laryngoscope 2005;115(10Pt2)1-30.
Antonelli M. Michetti V., Di Palma A. et al. Percutaneous translaryngeal versus surgical tracheostomy: A randomized trial with 1-yr double blind follow up. Critical Care Medicine 2005;33:1015-1020.
Beltrame F., Zussino M., Martinez B. et al. Percutaneous versus surgical bebside tracheostomy in the intensive care unit: a cohort study. Minerva Anestesiologica 2008;74:529-535.
Laos L.F. Percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy. Chest 2003;123:1336-1338.
Delaney A., Bagshaw S.M., Nalos M. Percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy versus surgical tracheostomy in critically ill patients: a systematic analysis. Critical Care 2006; 10:R55.
Scales DC., Thiruchelvam D., Kiss A. et al. The effect of tracheostomy timing during critical illness on long-term surgical. Critical Care Medicine 2008;36:2547-57.
Arabi Y. Haddad S., Shirawi N. et al. Early tracheostomy in intensive care trauma patients and resource utilization: a cohort study and literature review. Critical Care 2004;8:R347-R352.
Van Heurn LWE., Goei R., de Ploeg I. Late complications of percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy. Chest 1996;110:1572-1576.
Dulguerov P., Gysin C., Perneger TV. Percutaneous or surgical tracheostomy: a metaanalysis. Critical care Medicine 1999;27: 1617-25.
Wagner F. Nasseri R., Laucke U. et al. Percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy: results and long-term outcome of critically ill patients following cardiac surgery. Thoracic Cardiovascular Surgery 1998;46:352-356.
Moller MG., Staikeu JD., Bonelli P. et al. Early tracheostomy versus late tracheostomy in the surgical intensive care unit. American Journal of Surgery 2005;189:293-96.
Rumbak MJ., Newton M., Truncale T. et al. A prospective, randomized study comparing early percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy to prolonged translaryngeal intubation (delayed tracheostomy) in critically ill medical patients. Critical Care Medicine 2004;32:1689-94.
Griffiths J., Berber VS., Morgan l. et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of studies of the timing of tracheostomy in adult patients undergoing artificial ventilation. British Medical Journal 2005;330:1243-45.
Norwood S., Vallina VL., Short K. et al. Incidence of tracheal stenosis and other late complications after percutaneous tracheostomy. Annals of Surgery 2000;232:233-41
Wright SE., VanDahm K. Long-term care of the tracheostomy patient. Clinics in Chest Medicine 2003;24:473-87.
Carrer S., Basilico S., Rossi. S. et al. Outcomes of percutaneous tracheostomy. Minerva Anestesiologica 2009;75:607-15.