Indications and impact of cesarean at University Hospital Hernando Moncaleano Perdomo in Neiva

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

Patricia Borrero Zamudio Universidad Surcolombiana, Neiva Colombia
Andrea Cubillos Prada Universidad Surcolombiana
Leidy J. Orjuela Téllez Universidad Surcolombiana
Fabio Rojas Lozada Hospital Universitario de Neiva Hernando Moncaleano Perdomo. Neiva, Colombia.
Abstract

Cesarean section rate in Colombia has increased over the last years. Currently, cesarean deliveries represent about 28% of births, which is over the recommended rate by OMS (15%). The highest incidence is in San Andres, Atlantic Coast and Bogota, Medellin and Cali. Objective. To determine the incidence of cesarean section and know its main indications at University Hospital in Neiva. Materials and Methods. Descriptive, retrospective observational study. It was included women’s records who had vaginal birth or cesarean delivery between January 2011 and December 2012. Results. In 2011 it was recorded 1579 births, with an incidence of cesarean by 39%. Main obstetric indications were: previous cesarean section, associated hypertensive disorders, failed induction of labor, cephalopelvic disproportion and dystocia presentation. By 2012 it was recorded 2122 births, with a cesarean incidence of 39%. Among obstetric indications of cesarean are: previous cesarean section, failed induction, hypertensive disorders associated with pregnancy, cephalopelvic disproportion, acute fetal distress among others. Conclusions. Cesarean births have significantly increased in comparison to previous years, cesarean section rate in the analyzed period is by 39%, and main cause of this procedure is previous cesarean section followed by failed induction.


 

Keywords

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##

Author Biographies / See

Patricia Borrero Zamudio, Universidad Surcolombiana, Neiva Colombia

MD, Residente Ginecología y Obstetricia,

Andrea Cubillos Prada, Universidad Surcolombiana

MD, Residente Ginecología y Obstetricia.

Leidy J. Orjuela Téllez, Universidad Surcolombiana

MD, Residente Ginecología y Obstetricia.

Fabio Rojas Lozada, Hospital Universitario de Neiva Hernando Moncaleano Perdomo. Neiva, Colombia.

MD, Especialista en Ginecología y Obstetricia. Especialista en Epidemiología. Coordinador Postgrado de Ginecología y Obstetricia, Universidad Surcolombiana. Jefe del Departamento y Coordinador Servicio Ginecología y Obstetricia.
References

Boley, J.P. The history of caesarean section. 1935. Cmaj, 1991. 145(4): 319-22.

Appropriate technology for birth. Lancet, 1985. 2(8452): 436-7.

Martin, J.A., et al. Births: final data for 2009. Natl Vital Stat Rep, 2011. 60(1):1-70.

Betran, A.P., et al. Rates of caesarean section: analysis of global, regional and national estimates. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol, 2007. 21(2):98-113.

Villar, J., et al. Caesarean delivery rates and pregnancy outcomes: the 2005 WHO global survey on maternal and perinatal health in Latin America. Lancet, 2006. 367 (9525):1819-29.

A., R.G. Partos atendidos por cesárea: análisis de los datos de las encuestas nacionales de demografía y salud en Colombia 1995-2005.

Althabe, F., et al. Mandatory second opinion to reduce rates of unnecessary caesarean sections in Latin America: a cluster randomised controlled trial. Lancet, 2004. 363 (9425):1934-40.

Tita, A.T., et al. Timing of elective repeat cesarean delivery at term and neonatal outcomes. N Engl J Med, 2009. 360(2):111-20.

Cunningham FG, L.K., Bloom SL, Hauth JC, Rouse DJ, Spong CY, editors. Williams Obstetrics. 23rd ed. United States of America: McGraw-Hill Companies; 2010. Teratology and medications that affect the fetus; p. 315.

Most read articles by the same author(s)

OJS System - Metabiblioteca |