Home utilities companies. Reflections on their legal nature
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##
PDF (Español (España))
FLIP
HTML (Español (España))
The author (or authors) of the article titled: ________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________, which is submitted to the editorial process, certifies and authorizes the following considerations:
- I certify that I am a primary author of the article presented for possible publication. I guarantee that the entire content is a product of my intellectual contribution. All information and references to any material already published are correctly attributed and included in the references and citations. In cases when it is required, I have obtained the necessary permissions from those who possess the property rights.
- The article has not been published nor submitted simultaneously to any other serial publication for editorial consideration.
- I certify that all the references and cites in the article are cited according to the journal’s guidelines.
- I authorize the journal to evaluate and ask for external evaluation (peer reviewers).
- I guarantee that all the materials presented are entirely free of copyright. I am responsible for any lawsuit or any complaint related to intellectual property rights. I release Surcolombiana University of any charge.
- I authorize the journal to send emails to solve any situation presented during the editorial process.
- In the case that the article is approved for publication, as author and owner of the copyright, I transfer the rights to the journal unlimited time to include the manuscript in the Piélagus Journal. The text can be reproduced, edited, exhibited, and circulated in the country and abroad. That process can be through print, electronic publication, CD ROM, internet, full text or any other means known or to be known.
By completing the following, I confirm the previous to be true and agree to the aforementioned terms on __________ (month) the ____ (day), 20__ in ___city____, (____Country__).
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##
This article discusses the legal nature of home utility companies and the daily difficulties that emerge with their legal application. These difficulties are a consequence of the companies' tripartite classification as public, mixed, and private. Moreover, these difficulties also result from the validity of a hybrid legal framework where private and public law coexist and where such application in specific situations creates uncertainty. Particularly, it highlights emerging discussions in favor of or against whether these companies are State entities or not.
Further, it explores competent jurisdiction in order to understand the judicial processes in which these companies participate and the consequences of assuming a position on the matter. It concludes by offering recommendations to the public.
Downloads
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##
·Atehortúa, C. (2008). Régimen de los Servicios Públicos Domiciliarios. En el contexto de la doctrina constitucional. Medellín, Colombia: Biblioteca Jurídica Dike.
·Daza, D. (2008). Jurisdicción competente para conocer de las controversias contractuales de las empresas de servicios públicos domiciliarios. Revista Virtual Via Inveniendi Et Iudicandi. Recuperado de http://www.usta.edu.co/programas/derecho/revista_inveniendi/revista/imgs/HTML/revistavirtual/el 25-01-2016
·Del Saz, S. (1994). La Huida del Derecho Administrativo: Últimas manifestaciones. Aplausos y críticas. Revista de administración pública, ISSN 0034-7639, Nº 133, 1994, pp.57-98. Recuperado de https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=17205 el 02-03-
·Lozano, D., Castro, O.(2013). ¿Carecen de facultad sancionatoria las empresas de servicios públicos domiciliarios frente a los usuarios ?. Un estudio con relación al servicio de energía eléctrica en Colombia.
Fundación Universitaria Los Libertadores, Colombia. Revista VIA URIS, núm. 15, Julio-diciembre, pp. 49-63.
·Montaña, A. (2009). La desconfiguración del régimen jurídico de los servicios públicos domiciliarios a partir de la calificación de entidades públicas a las empresas de servicios públicos mixtas. Universidad Externado de Colombia, Revista digital de Derecho Administrativo,
No. 3, segundo semestre, pp.159 – 186, Bogotá.
·Suarez, D. (2008). Divagaciones de un abogado administrativista clásico en dialogo con un administrativista converso. A propósito de la Sentencia C-736 de 2007 de la Corte Constitucional sobre la naturaleza
jurídica de las ESP Mixtas. Revista Deloitte. Series de energía y servicios públicos. No. 03, junio.
·Vergara, A. (2014). "La summadivisio iuris' públicoprivado y la integración normativa en materias administrativas civiles, Revista de Derecho Privado, Universidad Externado de Colombia No. 6, enero-junio, p. 43-69. Recuperado de: http://revistas.uexternado.edu.co/index.php/derpri/article/view/3795/4032 el15-02-2015.
REFERENCIAS JURISPRUDENCIALES
CConst, C–736/2007, M.G,Monroy.
CConst, C-037/2003, A. Tafur.
CE. 3dic. 2008, e. 34.745. Actor: Movil Tech S.A.
CE.19 jun. 2008, e. AP 2005-00005-1. Jairo Vargas Londoño.
CE. 18 dic. 1997, e.1066.Concepto
CE. 31 ag.2005, e.1662.Concepto
