The State's objective and subjective role in unjust incarceration
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##
PDF (Español (España))
FLIP
HTML (Español (España))
The author (or authors) of the article titled: ________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________, which is submitted to the editorial process, certifies and authorizes the following considerations:
- I certify that I am a primary author of the article presented for possible publication. I guarantee that the entire content is a product of my intellectual contribution. All information and references to any material already published are correctly attributed and included in the references and citations. In cases when it is required, I have obtained the necessary permissions from those who possess the property rights.
- The article has not been published nor submitted simultaneously to any other serial publication for editorial consideration.
- I certify that all the references and cites in the article are cited according to the journal’s guidelines.
- I authorize the journal to evaluate and ask for external evaluation (peer reviewers).
- I guarantee that all the materials presented are entirely free of copyright. I am responsible for any lawsuit or any complaint related to intellectual property rights. I release Surcolombiana University of any charge.
- I authorize the journal to send emails to solve any situation presented during the editorial process.
- In the case that the article is approved for publication, as author and owner of the copyright, I transfer the rights to the journal unlimited time to include the manuscript in the Piélagus Journal. The text can be reproduced, edited, exhibited, and circulated in the country and abroad. That process can be through print, electronic publication, CD ROM, internet, full text or any other means known or to be known.
By completing the following, I confirm the previous to be true and agree to the aforementioned terms on __________ (month) the ____ (day), 20__ in ___city____, (____Country__).
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##
In this study, the Ratio Iuris research group exposes factors that brought the Colombian State under condemnation for unjust incarceration of its citizens through an investigation of the processes of direct reparation. These reparations were processed by the Judiciary Tribunals of Huila, Tolima, and Cundinamarca from 2007 to 2012 and the Council of State from 2007 to 2016, which determined whether the type of responsibility applied is objective or subjective. This research is focused on the actions of the Colombian Administrative Courts since 2006, the issuing of the New Administrative Procedure Code and the Judiciary Tribunal in 2011. These courts function as the last resort for processes where the sums involved do not exceed five hundred (500) basic salaries, which prevents these cases from being handled by the Council of State. The prevention of these type of processes from being handled by the highest judiciary administrative courts necessitates that in many parts of the country the closure of these cases is varied, along with different fundamental theories. These differences produce the result that similar rulings are not always attained, in spite of the similarities in factual and juridical fundamentals submitted to the administrative jurisdiction.
Downloads
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##
I. Bustamante Ledesma, A. (2008). La Responsabilidad Extracontractual del Estado, Bogotá D.C., Colombia: Grupo Editorial Leyer.
II. García de Enterría, E. (2013) Curso de derecho administrativo II. Madrid, España: Editorial Civita.
III. López Acuña, J.J, Martínez Torres. (2011). C. Responsabilidad Estatal por privación injusta de la libertad: criterios del Consejo de Estado al otorgar indemnización de perjuicios. Bucaramanga, Colombia: Universidad Industrial de Santander.
IV. López Morales, J. (2003). Responsabilidad del Estado por error judicial. Bogotá D.C., Colombia: Ediciones Doctrina y Ley.
V. Nader Orfale, R. (2010). Evolución Jurídica De La Responsabilidad Extracontractual Del Estado En Colombia, Barranquilla, Colombia: Universidad Libre Seccional Barranquilla, Advocatus.
VI. Martín Rebollo, L. (1992). Los límites de la responsabilidad patrimonial: una propuesta de reforma legislativa. Madrid, España: Editorial Civita.
VII. Ruiz Orejuela, W. (2010). Responsabilidad del Estado y sus Regímenes. Bogotá, Colombia: Ecoe Ediciones.
VIII. Saavedra Becerra, R. (2003). La responsabilidad contractual de la administración pública” Primera reimpresión, Bogotá D.C., Colombia: Ediciones jurídicas Gustavo Ibáñez.
IX. Vidal Perdomo, J. (2010). Temas de Derecho Administrativo Contemporáneo, Responsabilidad del Estado por la Privación Injusta de la Libertad, Bogotá, Colombia: Ecoe Ediciones.
REFERENCIAS JURISPRUDENCIALES
X. CE, 27 Nov. 2014, r2001-00120, C. Zambrano.
XI. CE, 27 Nov. 2014, r2001-00120, C. Zambrano.
XII. CE, e7736, D. Suárez.
XIII. CE, 9 Jun. 2005, e14740, R. Correa.
XIV. CE, 4 Dic, 2006, r200100120, M. Fajardo.
XV. CE, 27 Nov. 2014, r2001-00120, C. Zambrano.
XVI. CE, 25 Feb. 2009, r25508, M. Fajardo.
XVII. CE3, 11 May. 2006, M. Fajardo.
XVIII. CE, 13 Jul. 1993
XIX. CE, 9 Feb. 1995, e9550.
XX. CE, 2 Jun. 2005, r199902382.
XXI. CE, 4 Jun. 2006, e14721, R. Saavedra.
XXII. CE, 29 Jul. 1947.
XXIII. CE, 16 Ago, 2012, r66001233100000010117601,
e25214, M. Fajardo.
XXIV. Cconst, C-619/2002, C-918/2002).
