Nameless and anticipatory precautionary measures and the prominent role of the Constitutional Judge
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##
PDF (Español (España))
FLIP
HTML (Español (España))
The author (or authors) of the article titled: ________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________, which is submitted to the editorial process, certifies and authorizes the following considerations:
- I certify that I am a primary author of the article presented for possible publication. I guarantee that the entire content is a product of my intellectual contribution. All information and references to any material already published are correctly attributed and included in the references and citations. In cases when it is required, I have obtained the necessary permissions from those who possess the property rights.
- The article has not been published nor submitted simultaneously to any other serial publication for editorial consideration.
- I certify that all the references and cites in the article are cited according to the journal’s guidelines.
- I authorize the journal to evaluate and ask for external evaluation (peer reviewers).
- I guarantee that all the materials presented are entirely free of copyright. I am responsible for any lawsuit or any complaint related to intellectual property rights. I release Surcolombiana University of any charge.
- I authorize the journal to send emails to solve any situation presented during the editorial process.
- In the case that the article is approved for publication, as author and owner of the copyright, I transfer the rights to the journal unlimited time to include the manuscript in the Piélagus Journal. The text can be reproduced, edited, exhibited, and circulated in the country and abroad. That process can be through print, electronic publication, CD ROM, internet, full text or any other means known or to be known.
By completing the following, I confirm the previous to be true and agree to the aforementioned terms on __________ (month) the ____ (day), 20__ in ___city____, (____Country__).
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##
This legal dissertation, in conjunction with the cases' research, aims to realize an overview of the precautionary, nameless, and anticipatory measures phenomenon in the Colombian legal system, and particularly constitutional actions. This dissertation shows the copious utility that has enabled Judges to order, according to his/her –regulated- discretion, all cautions regarded as necessary for efficient judicial decisions, thus counteracting the impregnable effect the delay has. The conclusions show a prominent scenario with regards to the chief judicial operator as protagonist, as long as the said authority's exercise avoids affecting the subjects' procedural balance.
Downloads
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##
·Couture, E. J. (1953). Notas para un Vocabuario de Derecho Procesal. Revista de la Facultad de Derecho de México , Sección de Previa (10), 115-141.
·López Blanco, H. F. (2012). Procedimiento Civil (Undécima ed., Vol. I). Bogotá D.C.: Editores Dupré.
·Malagón Bohórquez, P. H. (2011). Superintendencia de notariado y registro. Recuperado el 05 de Mayo de 2014, del sitio web: http://www.supernotariado.gov.co/portalsnr/images/archivosupernotariado/registro/TallerRegistral2011/memorias%20medidas%20cautelares.pdf
·Quiroga Cubillos, H. E. (1991). Procesos y Medidas Cautelares (Segunda Edición ed.). Bogotá D.C.: Ediciones OKEY Impresores.
·Real Academia de la Lengua Española. (2001). Versión electrónica del Diccionario de la Real Academia de la Lengua Española,. Recuperado el
de Junio de 2014, de http://lema.rae.es/drae/?val=proceso
·Rocco, U. (1977). Tratado de Derecho Procesal Civil, V Proceso Cautelar. Bogotá, Buenos Aires.: Temis, Depalma.
·Rojas, M. E. (2004). Teoría General del Proceso. Bogotá: Universidad Externado de Colombia.
·Sanabria Santos, H. N. (2000). Configuración Procesal de la Pretensión de Tutela. Bogotá D.C.: Universidad Externado de Colombia.
·Véscovi, E. (1984). Teoría General del Proceso. Bogotá D.C.: Editorial Temis.
·Villamil Portilla, E. (1999). Teoría Constitucional del Proceso. Bogotá D.C.: Ediciones Doctrina y Ley LTDA.
REFERENCIAS JURISPRUDENCIALES
·CConst, A.-035/2007 H. Sierra.
·CConst, A.-166/2006 M. Cepeda.
·CConst, C-379/2004, A. Beltrán.
·CConst, C-523/2009, M. Calle.
·CConst, T-023/95 J. Arango, T-023/95.
·CConst, T–147/2007, H. Sierra.
REFERENCIAS NORMATIVAS
·D. 2591/1991 (Presidente de la República de Colombia 19 de Noviembre de 1991).
·L. 1437/2011 (Congreso de la República 18 de Enero de 2011).
·L. 1564/2012 (Congreso de la República 12 de Julio de 2012).
·L. 906/2004 (Congreso de la República 1 de Septiembre de 2004).
·L.472/1998 (Congreso de la República 5 de Agosto de 1998).
